Pride and Prejudice Essay

The novel Pride and Prejudice was written during the mall of the Romantic period in western literature, but it is itself rather untypical of other fictional works of the period. Unlike the great Romantic novels and poems of the period, which ordinarily praised youthful getions, Austens work minimizes them. Austens works ar models of restraint. alternatively of the wild force of nature, Austen concentrates on family life in small face towns. Instead of rampant emotionalism Austen emphasizes a balance between grounds and emotion.Instead of suicide and unrequited love, Austen offers elopement and nuptials. Austens prime news report of nuptials is far from trivial (Walder 1996, p. 52) as it is considered today as marriage was an grievous issue in Austens time and it was the only time when a woman had the freedom to get up contendd socio-economic mobility though some critics rallys that she considers that considering m iodiny as the criterion for marriage is naughtyly terrib le. (collins p. 161) This distill explains this correlation between socio-economic view and marriage.Irony or the contrast between the expected and the actual is the promontory literary device Austen uses to comment on the manners of English nobility in Pride and Prejudice. Her jeering takes different forms for different. A nonher stylistic take in that one can observe in this extract in everyday and throughout novel in particular is her formal style. Perhaps the firstly thing close to Jane Austens style that strikes the reader is its formality by modern standards. This is a characteristic of her time, and of the outlook she shared.The decorum of her prose represents a check habit of mind and a disciplined attitude towards life. But the formality has about it nothing of the pomp us or verbose. On the contradictory one of the chief qualities of her narrative style is precision, lucidity, and economy. With these is combined a familiar tone of irony. The irony is the cuttin g edge, as it was an instrument of moral perception which was Jane Austens sensibility. Mr. Collins speaks about his conception of a true marriage.He takes the conventional notions about marriage of true minds where partners have similar dispositions and ideas about life in general. Mr. Collins philosophy of marriage reminds Charlottes reminds Charlottes matrimonial ideology as she also consider the harmony of characters and minds as the ultimate source of matrimonial bliss and place no richness to money or fortune. She regularizes in Chapter 6 Happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of chance. If the dispositions of the parties are ever so hygienic get laidn to each other, or ever so similar before-hand, it does not advance their felicity in the least.They always contrive to grow sufficiently unlike afterwards to have their share of vexation and it is better to know as little as possible of the defects of the person with whom you are to pass your life. Mr. Collins also suf fers from the same mistaken idealism like Charlotte. Thats the reason he says My dear Charlotte and I have but one mind and one way of thinking. in that location is in everything a close to remarkable resemblance of character and ideas between us. We imagem to have been intentional for each other. (Chapter XXXV) Furthermore, he longs for same matrimonial felicity for Elizabeth in her married life without knowing what is her ideals of marriage and what she wants to be come out of marriage. Jane capital of Texas has beautifully employed irony as Mr. Collins wishes something for Elizabeth that she does not like. Furthermore, Jane capital of Texas juxtaposes this conception of matrimonial bliss with his own conception of marriage and its preconditions that prosper throughout the novel. Jane capital of Texas has Marxian conception of marriage and she considers wealth and socio-economic well-being as the foremost pre-condition of marriage.For the author, in the persona of Mr. Benne ts daughter Elizabeth, however, irony is potent toy and a defensive weapon in the war against stupidity. The author uses Elizabeth to skewer self-important characters such as Mr. Collins and Mrs. Bennet. til now Elizabeth is also blind to her own character faults, and her very blindness is other example of Austens use of irony. In her misunderstandings with Darcy, she (who is blind to her own presumption in her ability to read character) accuses him false and excessive pride, while he (who is prejudiced against people with less money than he has) accuses her of prejudice.The rest of the succession memorialises the assumption and pomposity of Mr. Collins. Mr. Collins is a type of character that Jane Austin uses to highlight the posing and pretensions of English society of the time and the vain ego of an individual. His acquisition of fortune by chance to get an approval of dame Catherine de Bourgh has do him to think of himself in higher terms and judgment. All his haughtin ess and snobbery in the extract is a manifestation of this high opinion of his own self. His high opinion of Charlotte is also a product of this imagined high placement in society.He earns a handsome income and owns a house, so he requires a wife at this stage that can ameliorate his own fortune. Here Jane Austin elaborates the interrelation of marriage and money. If Mr. Collins would not have owned a house and would not have made a good fortune by chance, he would never think of having marriage. So he imagined conception of marriage as a stick to between tow souls that are alike in their dispositions and character, seems only a caprice of imagination only. Establishing a correlation between marriage and neighborly status is an important theme of Austen in this extract.Jane Austen also makes her reader see the correlation in the light of her contemporary hearty conventions. Earlier in the novel, when Elizabeth refuses the proposal of Mr Collins, he is unwilling to accept it. It was highly improbable that a woman of Elizabeth cordial status would reject the proposal of a at ease person. His self-importance is another factor that contributes toward his un-acceptance if her refusal. He disapprove of Elizabeths social status in these talking to that Elizabeths portion is unhappily so small that it will in all likelihood undo the effects of her loveliness and amiable qualifications.His social status reassures himself by saying that you are not estimable in your rejection of me, I shall chuse to attribute it to your wish of change magnitude my love by suspense, according to the usual practice of elegant females. There is a dichotomy of Elizabeths refusal to Mr. Collin and her manifestation as an ideal woman of Austen who thinks marriage in terms of money. Walder (1996) has rightly pointed out In a social world where only possibility of movement in a womens life was through marriage, choice of partner was as serious a business as choice of career was for a man. Seen in this light, Elizabeths refusal of Mr. Collins is as brave an act as that of a young man who refuses to enter the family firm. (Walder, 52) Jane Austen used Elizabeth as her mouth-piece to ridicule the fictitious idealism of various characters throughout the novel. In this case, Elizabeth does not directly say any word about Mr. Collins viewpoints but only show her contempt by feeling sorry for Poor Charlotte but she revisits her survey about her and says that she is not innocent as she herself has decided to marry Collins and choose a pretentious society.Jane Austen reflects here that if someone is placed in this situation, then it is tragic but someone has consciously decided to go for a vain marriage proposal, he ore she should be fully amenable for it. So it was Charlotte own disposition rather than chance that her placed her in that situation. But when Elizabeth herself refuses the proposal of Mr. Collins, she was also caught in fictitious idealism. She is of th e view that as her father is a gentleman she is on equal terms with Darcy and Bingleys. (Brooke, 1999. p. 158) Jane Austen beautifully shows her fictitious idealism as well.Jane Elizabeth also shows, through the character of Maria, the self-esteem of English gentry. Unlike Elizabeth, Maria is amazed and amused by the social decorum. She was still startled at the nine dinners at Rosings and several teas. This extract further another aspect of Jane Austens art i. e. handling of dialogue. She had a remarkable ear, and must have been a shrewd observer of foible in speech. The speech of her characters is always consonant with their personalities yet it never approaches caricature. In the extract, Mr. Collins dialogues are true reflection of his personality yet it does not portray him as a caricature.Marias dialogues are as expressive of her self and her tender age. So this extract and other textual examples from Pride and Prejudice clearly manifest that Jane Austen has skillfully conv eyed her basic theme of money and marriage through her subtle style. She does not waste her words and there is uncommon clarity with economy in her art. References Austen, Hane. (2006). Pride and Orejudice. new-made York Poenguin Classic. Brooke, C. (1999). Jane Austen Illusion and reality. Rochester, NY D. S. Brewer. Walder, D. (1996). The realist novel. Approaching literature. London Routledge.