Comparing Person-based Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

AbstractThis wallpaper presents a par of two curative ideas, person-centred arise and cognitive behavioral therapy in basis of the role of pleader and leaf node. It specifically describes the role of the node and advocator and then comp bes them accordingly. The paper will besides discuss the strengths and limitations of the two progresses in order to differentiate them better.IntroductionBoth person-centred therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy provide support and help to diligents by addressing singular matters. Both practices mete open away the common therapeutic goal of welf atomic number 18 improvement. The necessity of an integrated flak to person-centred therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy has called for numerous researches to investigate the roles of the different parties (Moon, 2006). In the comparison of the two therapeutic concepts in terms of the role of counselor-at-law and client, there is a clear difference that is sanitary defined in th e succeeding discussions. In person-centred, the patient is the expert on himself and finds his or her own way, time in CBT the counsellor is the expert and leads the patient (Branaman, 2001). The approaches also score strengths and limitations that be discusses comprehensively. Therapeutic alliance The role of the client and the counsellorIn terms of the therapeutic relationship, it is critical to refer sure that the result of the therapy is effective and preferable. In relation to these two approaches of counselling, the therapeutic relationships argon different from each anformer(a). In each approach, the therapist and the client have different roles to play in the processes. Therapeutic relationship in the cognitive behavioral therapy resembles that between a student and his or her teacher (Burkitt, 2008). The role of the counsellor is to provide therapeutic instructions and recommendations to the client who listens and then does exactly as they atomic number 18 told b y the therapist. In this bod of relationship, the therapist uses steer structures in directing clients on the assortments in behaviour. In this instance, the therapist acts as the vertex of focus since they op congeal much on the clients cognitive and behavioural changes (Branaman, 2001). However, for the purposes of desirable and effective burdens, collaboration is emphasised in the process of the therapy.The therapist employs Socratic dialogue, which is essential in supporting clients in tenets like the identification of assumptions, value and norms that have affected the emotional and mental functionality. It involves a disciplined challenge or probing that coffin nail be used in the move of thought in various directions and for several purposes, which include geographic expedition of hard ideas (Timulak, 2005). The therapist in this approach questions the client to find out the honesty of things, to open up matters together with problems, to reveal presumptions and beliefs and to find out what they recognize and what they do not know, as well as following out rational meanings of thought and managing the discussion (Burkitt, 2008). The proficiency is important in the relationship between the client and the therapist because it is disciplined, methodical and normally focuses on critical principles, matters and problems. In addition to this, the client is encouraged by the therapist to change these assumptions and identify an unconventional concept for the present and future living (Timulak, 2005). The therapist, in this instance, assists in the promotion of the adoption of remedial realizeing skills. The client, in this kind of association is always presented with new insights in relation to the matters they are experiencing and hence chooses the round effective and efficient ways of acquiring change.The cognitive behavioural therapy employs the methods that are aimed at individual counselling. It employs the Socratic Method that comprise s of numerous questions to be responded to by the client. Counsellors employ various techniques of behaviour, emotion and cognition different techniques are tailored to fit individual clients (Wetherell et al 2001). Nevertheless(prenominal), the client is also wedded chance to ask the therapist some questions. The approach utilises the aspect of home work at or coursework that encourages the patients to practice the skills acquired. thitherfore, cognitive behavioural therapys major technique is the ABC one, which employs the Socratic concept.On the other hand, the therapeutic relationship in the person-centred therapy is very different from the cognitive behavioural therapy. Here, the relationship between the therapist and the client is critical because the therapy focuses on the client as they turn to be the point of focus of the therapy. As a result of this, the therapist has to make sure that there is maintenance of respect, empathy and honesty towards the client (Timulak, 2005 ). Communication is also important in this approach particularly between the counsellor and the client. The relationship should be equal since it important in enabling change in the client.The client centred therapy approach utilises the attitudes of the therapist as the main technique. The therapists attitude towards the patient determines the result of the whole process. The approach makes use of the aspects of perceive of hearing and hearing and clarification of feelings and ideas (Timulak, 2005). This approach does not employ the methods that encompass directive aspects. In this therapy, there is nothing like questioning or probing, which are commonly seen or done in the cognitive behavioural therapy.Strengths of cognitive behavioural therapyOf all the known psychological therapies, cognitive behavioural therapy is the most clinically researched and examined and is generally considered as one of the most effective mover of dealing with anxiety (Wetherell et al 2001). The app roach is affordable and the overall turn of manipulation can last for as few as sextette sessions of one hour each for minor subjects of anxiety, though normally in the area of 10-20 sessions. It has more appeal or attraction in the esthesis that it is exclusively natural and different from medication, there are no harms or side effects. The therapy is most commonly provided as a face-to-face excuse between the counsellor and patient but there is more demonstration to demonstrate that its principles can be used in several other frameworks (Denscombe, 2007). For instance, interactive com siteerized cognitive behavioural therapy is on the rise, however, it can be condition in groups or in the self-help books. These alternatives are very appealing to race that find the practicalities or ideas of frequent meetings with a counsellor not meet them. CBT is an approach that is highly structured and involves the patient and the counsellor collaborating on the objectives of treatment that are specific, quantifiable, time-limited, attainable and actual or real. The patient is motivated to release down the behaviours, feelings and thoughts that confine them in an undesirable cycle and they get to learn strategies and skills that can be used in the daily life for the purposes of percentage them cope better (Burkitt, 2008). Weaknesses of cognitive behavioural therapyThere are some problems with cognitive behavioural therapy that make it undesirable and unsuitable for some individuals. The concept qualification not be effective for individuals with mental health problems that are more complex or for those that have difficulties in learning. The major focus of the concept is usually close the patient and their capacity to change their behaviours. any(prenominal) individuals feel like this is a focus that is too narrow, and disregards too many a(prenominal) significant matters such as family, histories of self and extensive emotional issues (Moon, 2006). There is no scope within the concept for individual examination and exploration of emotions, or even of looking at the challenging issues from different angles or perspectives. For these matters to be dealt with in a proper manner, a patient would have to turn to another method, probably along the lines of the psychodynamic counselling.In order to full gain from the cognitive behavioural therapy, the client has to make sure that they give a substantial level of commitment and dedication as well as participation. Those who argue against the therapy bring that since it only deals with the present issues, and focuses on issues that are very specific, it does not adequately address the probable causes of the mental health problems like a child who is not happy (Furedi, 2004).Sceptics of the concept claim that just by an individual being told that their perceptions of the world do not correctly reflect the reality by the concepts counsellor are not enough to change the cognition of a patient. A criticism that is more salient for some patients susceptibility be that the counsellor initially may accomplish something of a specialist role, in the sense that they offer expertise or experience that is problem solving in the cognitive psychology (Palmer, 2001). Some individuals superpower also feel that the counsellor can be playing a leading role in their probing and somehow commanding in terms of their suggestions. Patients who are hunky-dory with self-examination, who readily employ the scientific approach for the exploration of their personal therapy and who put confidence in the basic theoretical method of cognitive therapy, might find the concept an important one (Gillon, 2007). However, patients that appear to be less easy or contented with any of these, or even whose excruciation is of a more common interpersonal nature, to an extent that it cannot be in a position of easily being framed as an interplay or interaction between behaviours, thoughts and emotions withi n a particular environment might find this kind of therapy useful to them and their conditions. Cognitive behavioural therapy has always be to be helpful to the people that suffer from serious conditions, such as depression, uneasiness, fear or obsessive compulsive and panic (Denscombe, 2007).Strengths of person-centred therapyThe concept of the approach is that the patient is the take up professional or expert on themselves and has the best position of helping themselves. Its strengths include the incident that the patient is the one guiding the experience whereas the therapist reflects on what the patient is doing or saying and can paraphrase the ideas together with practices (Giddens, 2001). The therapist does not judge the patient as being right or wrong. The objective of the person-centred therapy is improving the trust of the patient in themselves and their self-confidence. It also helps them in becoming more able to cognise in the period, and letting go of the emotions th at are unproductive and negative, such as guilt regarding the past events that are difficult to change (Branaman, 2001).Weaknesses of person-centred therapy The fact that the approach is client-led is one of its biggest weaknesses since it is up to the patient to be in a position of processing information and making rational decisions for their personal well-being. In case the client is not capable of doing this as required by the concept, the radical of a therapist not making judgments about the information provided or processed by the client can turn out to be counterproductive to the patients welfare (Robb et al, 2004).The approach requires creation of an lengthy and honest relationship with a counsellor (Bolton, 2001). The advocates of this therapy would claim that the counsellor could work faster, if that is their wish. However, if they are less than one hundred per cent committed to on the job(p) via their issues, the required duration of the treatment can seriously exceed or surpass the money and time of the patient. Still the counsellors would cite that unlike cognitive behavioural therapy, the major focus of the treatment or approach is about being in the period and the concerns of today, instead of upon long-ago past excavation (Branaman, 2001).ConclusionIn the discussions above, it is apparent that these two therapies have different approaches to treating patients of the alike and different problems. Both of them focus on the conscious mind, the current issues and problems that the patients might have. Both of them have a positive perception of the nature of military personnel beings and perceive the person as not essentially being an outcome of their past experiences, but recognise that they are capable of determining their individual futures. Both approaches try to improve the welfare of patients by way of a collaborative therapeutic relationship, which allows and enhances health adaptation techniques in patients that are having psychological pain and distress in their lives. The biggest differences in the two approaches include the fact that the relationship between clients and therapists differ. The role of the counsellor in cognitive behavioural therapy is to provide therapeutic instructions and recommendations to the client who listens and then exactly does as they are told, while in the person-centred therapy, the relationship between the therapist and the client is critical because it on the client as they turn to be the point of focus.ReferencesBolton, G. (2001). Reflective Practice Writing and Professional Development. London Sage.Giddens, A. (2001). Sociology (4th Ed). Cambridge Polity (Classic Text).Gillon, E. (2007). Person-Centred instruction Psychology. London Sage.Branaman, A. (2001). Self and Society. Oxford Blackwell.Burkitt, I. (2008). Social Selves Theories of Self and Society. London Sage.Denscombe, M. (2007). The Good enquiry Guide. (3rd Ed). Maidenhead Open University Press.Furedi, F. (2004). Thera py culture. London Routledge.Moon, J. A. (2006). Learning Journals. London Routledge.Palmer, S. (ed.) (2001). Multicultural counseling A Reader. London Sage.Robb, M. et al (eds) (2004). Communication, Relationships and Care A Reader. London RoutledgeTimulak R. (2005). interrogation in Psychotherapy and Counselling. London Sage.Wetherell, M., Taylor, T., Yates, S. J. ( eds) (2001). Discourse Theory and Practice A Reader. London Sage.