Separation Of Church And State Essay -- History Historical Education R

disengagement of Church and StateBy the halfway of the 20th Century, the joined States had emerged as a worldpower. It accomplished this by means of its leadership in defeating Germany andjapan in World War II. These two countries main objective was to enslave theworld and destroy political, spectral, and economic freedom. In Germany orJapan, anyone who disagreed with these goals, or was unlike was destroyed.This was a common practice in these two fascist countries. Unfortunately, atthe same time of its emergence as a world power, the United States began to slipinto a form of juridical fascism. This slide began when the U.S. absolute legal systembegan to abandon the religious principles on which this tribe was founded.The abandonment officially began in 1947 in Everson v. plug-in of Education, whenthe court announced, The inaugural amendment has erected a wall amidst church building and dry land. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve thesligh test breach. (Barton, Original p.13) This exact instance began the reversalof Supreme woo trends and opinions that had lasted for one hundred and fiftyyears. Now, for just about fifty years, the Supreme uprightnesscourt , and the United Statespopulation in general, has utilize the phrase separation of church and state whenreferring to the organized religion clause of the initiatory Amendment.The 1st amendments actual vocabulary is Congress shall make no law respecting an substantiation of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. (Barton,America To p.15) But, because of the Supreme Courts continuous citing of a wall of separation and separation of church and state, the publics idea ofthe 1st amendments religion clause has been shaped by phrases which do notappear anywhere in the Constitution. The First Congress, which passed thisAmendment in 1789, intend to prohibit the establishment of a national religion.In fact, they didnt mind the establishment of official relig ions by states.At the start of the Ameri derriere Revolution, nine of the long dozen colonies hadestablished religions, so ostensibly no one was opposed to the mating of churchand state.Unfortunately, this separation colloquy has been so furiously pounded into our heads,that a line drawing is painted falsely into our heads a picture of a roomful ofgodless atheists, agnostics, and deists frame our Constitution in 178... ...efore Everson v. Board of Education, the Supreme Courtmade measureless decisions regarding religion that directly match the past 50years of religious oppression. Some of these decisions refer to the U.S. as aChristian country. One, Davis v. Beason, in 1889, strikes raze bigamy andpolygamy, rejecting arguments that they were religious exercises. The Courtstates Davis, a Mormon, was wrong, and that his actions were crimes by the lawsof all civilized and Christian countries. This decision all the way shows the role of the legislators of the era.(Barton, Orig inal.. p.64-65)The solution to this problem lies in educating the hoi polloi of this great republicas to the intent of the Founders. In the evidence presented, it can be clearlyseen that the judicial fascism being practiced today and now, is clearly notwhat the Founding Fathers think for our country. The solution to thereligious liberty/ groom prayer debate lies in the hands of Congress.(Barton, Aguide.. p.36)The media portrays supporters of a drill prayer amendment as a radical fringeminority, when recent studies and surveys slang shown that 71% of people privilege anamendment for school prayer. Separation Of Church And State Essay -- History diachronic Education RSeparation of Church and StateBy the middle of the 20th Century, the United States had emerged as a worldpower. It accomplished this through its leadership in defeating Germany andJapan in World War II. These two countries main objective was to enslave theworld and destroy political, religious, and economic freedom. In Germany orJapan, anyone who disagreed with these goals, or was different was destroyed.This was a common practice in these two fascist countries. Unfortunately, atthe same time of its emergence as a world power, the United States began to slipinto a form of judicial fascism. This slide began when the U.S. Supreme Courtbegan to abandon the religious principles on which this nation was founded.The abandonment officially began in 1947 in Everson v. Board of Education, whenthe court announced, The 1st amendment has erected a wall between church andstate. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve theslightest breach. (Barton, Original p.13) This exact case began the reversalof Supreme Court trends and opinions that had lasted for one hundred and fiftyyears. Now, for almost fifty years, the Supreme Court , and the United Statespopulation in general, has used the phrase separation of church and state whenreferring to the religion clause of the 1 st Amendment.The 1st amendments actual wording is Congress shall make no law respecting anestablishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. (Barton,America To p.15) But, because of the Supreme Courts continuous citing of a wall of separation and separation of church and state, the publics idea ofthe 1st amendments religion clause has been shaped by phrases which do notappear anywhere in the Constitution. The First Congress, which passed thisAmendment in 1789, intended to prohibit the establishment of a national religion.In fact, they didnt mind the establishment of official religions by states.At the start of the American Revolution, nine of the thirteen colonies hadestablished religions, so obviously no one was opposed to the coupling of churchand state.Unfortunately, this separation talk has been so furiously pounded into our heads,that a picture is painted falsely into our heads a picture of a roomful ofgodless atheists, agnostics, and deists framing our Constit ution in 178... ...efore Everson v. Board of Education, the Supreme Courtmade countless decisions regarding religion that directly contradict the past 50years of religious oppression. Some of these decisions refer to the U.S. as aChristian country. One, Davis v. Beason, in 1889, strikes down bigamy andpolygamy, rejecting arguments that they were religious exercises. The Courtstates Davis, a Mormon, was wrong, and that his actions were crimes by the lawsof all civilized and Christian countries. This decision clearly shows theintent of the legislators of the era.(Barton, Original.. p.64-65)The solution to this problem lies in educating the people of this great republicas to the intent of the Founders. In the evidence presented, it can be clearlyseen that the judicial fascism being practiced today and now, is clearly notwhat the Founding Fathers intended for our country. The solution to thereligious liberty/school prayer debate lies in the hands of Congress.(Barton, Aguide.. p.36)The media portrays supporters of a school prayer amendment as a radical fringeminority, when recent studies and surveys have shown that 71% of people favor anamendment for school prayer.